The value equation

The value equation is the single most useful one-line framework in modern direct response. Once you've internalized it, you stop guessing at why offers convert or don't, you diagnose the equation.

The equation

 Dream Outcome ร— Perceived Likelihood
Value = โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Time Delay ร— Effort & Sacrifice

Value, as perceived by the buyer, is the ratio of what they'll get times how likely they'll get it, divided by how long it takes and how hard it is. Four variables. Every offer lives or dies on all four.

Variable 1. Dream outcome

The outcome the prospect actually wants. Not what you sell; what they want. "A faster website" is a feature. "Your site never goes down during Black Friday again" is a dream outcome.

Moves that increase dream outcome:

Variable 2. Perceived likelihood of achievement

The prospect's belief that the outcome will actually happen for them. Every prospect has seen promises fail. Their default is skepticism. Your job is to raise perceived likelihood without lying.

Moves that increase perceived likelihood:

Variable 3. Time delay

How long until they get the outcome. Perceived delay, not actual. If they believe it'll take 6 months, it takes 6 months in the equation, even if results start in week 1.

Moves that decrease time delay:

Variable 4. Effort & sacrifice

What the prospect has to do, give up, or endure to get the outcome. Work they'll do. Habits they'll change. People they'll upset. Risks they'll take.

Moves that decrease effort & sacrifice:

Using the equation to diagnose weak offers

Whenever an offer isn't converting, one of the four variables is the culprit. Run through the diagnostic:

The offer isn't converting, why?
1. Dream outcome, is what we're promising actually what they want? Or are we describing features?
2. Perceived likelihood, do they believe it will work for them? What proof are they missing?
3. Time delay, does it feel too slow? Can we reframe what they'll see in week 1?
4. Effort, does this feel like more work than they can take on? What can we remove or take off their plate?

The multiplicative property

Each variable is a multiplier. Doubling dream outcome doubles value. Cutting effort in half doubles value. But zeroing out any variable zeros out the whole equation.

The strongest offers don't maximize one variable, they optimize all four.

Counterintuitive applications

Higher price can increase perceived likelihood

"Free" products are associated with low-quality. A premium price signals quality and commitment. Raising price sometimes increases conversion because it raises perceived likelihood.

Requiring effort can increase perceived outcome

"Gym membership" that requires showing up is more valued than "pill that requires nothing." When prospects must invest effort, they believe the outcome more.

This doesn't contradict the equation, it's a case where one variable (effort) rises but another (perceived likelihood) rises more, net improving the value.

Applying the equation to your next offer

  1. Write your offer.
  2. Score each variable on 1โ€“10 from the prospect's perspective.
  3. Pick the lowest-scoring variable. That's where to invest effort.
  4. Ship the improved version. Re-score. Re-iterate.

Most offers double conversion in 2โ€“3 iterations of this loop. The equation is diagnostic. Use it.

Related: Grand slam offers ยท Bonuses that stack ยท Guarantees